Re: Harry Potter: Your Child's Introduction to Witchcraft!

Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 02:30:32 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy
Size: 3,244 bytes

On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:42:18 -0500, JayPeeEye <email-address-deleted>
tossed a golden coin into a well and made a fervent wish:
>On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:31:56 GMT I replied to Glyph
><email-address-deleted> on a piece of toilet paper while scribbling
>their name and phone number on the bathroom wall in alt.conspiracy
>
>>On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:01:49 -0500, JayPeeEye <email-address-deleted>
>>tossed a golden coin into a well and made a fervent wish:
>>
>>
>>>Testy aren't we. do I detect a bit of an ego? A little
>>>closed-mindedness? Thinking your answers are always the right ones?
>>>
>>>Hit me with some of your black magic.
>>
>>Quick points, number 1: I notice that you do not refute any of the
>>points I have stated, rather you choose to attack me with the same
>>old hat of "close mindedness" that I have heard from a thousand
>>pagans before, and will hear from a thousand pagans in the future no
>>doubt. so in essence you have no facts to argue or disprove my points
>>which are facts, provable and identifiable facts and not beliefs.
>>number
>
>If a thousand have told you and a 1000 more will again, have you
>looked into yourself to see if they may be right?
yup I looked into myself, and they are wrong. I just have little
patience for ignorance.
>
>> 2: if you are talking about a historical event such as the
>>witch trials, the facts and therefore what you call the answers are
>>Provable, (if you are willing to take time to look them up before
>>talking out of your ass like you did ) and therefore yes in this
>>case, my answer is the right one, one based on knowledge rather than
>>assumption.
>
>So many different places have the facts recorded so many different
>ways, but yet to you, the one you read is the correct one, no
>matter what anyone has to say.
pretty much, mainly because I look for the official records, not what
a bunch of neo pagans who believe they are worshipping some ancient
religion when they are being taught a faith 50 years old, or some
offshoot thereof have to say. also I still notice you have yet to
refute any of my facts, telling me you are not doing any research on
your own, merely bitching that I am using one of many sets of "facts"
around. well if that is true, show me, cite contrary facts show me
something other than your wagging tongue.
>
>>Number 3: Ok, the Black magick comment shows your ignorance here.
>>Crowley defines magick as exerting your will onto the universe. he
>>saw no lines between black and white, it is all matters of control.
>>Read Crowley's The Book of the Law, you might learn something, but I
>>don't think you will, it is easier to remain ignorant rather than
>>search for the answers isn't it?
>
>You must not listen to much music. Those were lyrics to a song,
>most people can pick up on that, you were too busy thinking that
>its all about you, that you didn't bother to look elsewhere. Do you
>ever see the trees in the forest?
actually I listen to alot of music everything from Chopin to Front
242, but did you ever think about putting quotes around your little
lyric? maybe give some credit to the band perhaps rather than try to
claim that thought as your own?
Glyph
prickme2@_NO_SPAM_hotmail.com
http://glyphworks.crimsonblog.com