Re: Web Porn?????

Date: 24 Feb 2003 21:28:37 GMT
Newsgroups: rec.arts.theatre.musicals
Size: 1,820 bytes

>Well, honey, the man who thinks a "pet" (of his) lyric outvalues the
>violent treatment of organic things, the perceptions of SENSITIVE
>children, (who spend most of their childhoods dreaming in
>animal symbols), and who extolls the virtues of musicals filled with
>violence, while obsessed with counting "vulgarisms" is just the sort
>of schizo whacko who would post such a link. (And lie about the
>reason?)
My goodness, someone's gone off the deep-end. Can anybody make sense of the
above post?
Mike Callery was correct that the perfectly legitimate link to The Chainsaw
Boys improv group became a link to porn when TCB stopped paying for their
domain name. Rhonda was kind enough to point this out to me, and, as far as I
can tell, nobody took offense. If I ever scrape together some time, I'll
figure out how to edit my webpage - I've not been able to change anything on it
in about three years (during which time one link went from Boys to blondes).
Perhaps this post has something to do with my comedy song, Dog Food, which
brought down the packed house at the Donnell last month. If that's the case,
one might ask whether the poster has ever heard the song in question.
The quote of my post:
>Feb 12, 2003, 3:48am (EST+5)
>> From: email-address-deleted (Noel Katz)
>> <<<one hasn't gotten much for one's c-note if one's only moderately
>> entertained
has to do with the viability of reviving No Strings. (I don't think it's a
good idea.)
It's also possible that the post is a reference to Hey Jimmy John Jack Joe, a
song about the value of seeing things through children's eyes - a song that has
always moved me, particularly when I was a sensitive child.
I'm off to rehearsal, but, when I get time, I might post the lyric to Dog Food
for your amusement. http://hometown.aol.com/noelkatz/main.html