Re: Why Learn Classical Guitar?

Date: 11 May 2003 20:44:57 -0700
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.guitar
Size: 1,664 bytes

"jdr" <email-address-deleted> wrote in message news:<xOEua.6621$email-address-deleted>...
> I was pondering this question -- why learn the classical guitar (as opposed
> to an accoustic or electric guitar)? In a culture where most store push
> people to the accoustic or electric section -- what is the selling point for
> starting with classical? I would appreciate any inputs -- esp. from
> experienced players and teachers on what advantages (or disadvantages) there
> are to beginning with the study of the classical guitar.
>
> My thoughts were pretty simple
>
> * By studying the classical guitar you will learn how to read standard
> musical notation.
>
Generally speaking this is true, but I'd never recommend classical
simply because you will learn to read. There are plenty of steel
string teachers out there who will teach you to read, and any jazz
study will almost undoubtedly require you to read.
> * You will learn more than the hits of the last 40 yrs -- but the hits of
> the last 400 years!
>
Provided you like the hits of the last 400 years. You should play
classical guitar because you love classical guitar and classical
music.
> * The classical guitar is not (generally) as loud as other guitars, so
> practice is much less noticeable or disruptive to others.
>
Actually, a classical guitar is typically louder than a steel string
flattop if both are played in the same manner. My LoPrinzi is lounder
than my Martin HD-28 played fingerstyle.
> * No amplification is required.
>
Yes, but that's true for any acoustic guitar.
> * There is (generally) no singing involved!
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> John