Re: Wow, new website.

Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:40:18 GMT
Newsgroups: rec.music.artists.springsteen
Size: 1,860 bytes

Well, I don't know that "most" people have broadband, but I agree that the
website is pretty dull. Superficially it looks nice and the lyric database
is good, but there's nothing really there that isn't available on any number
of other sites. Hopefully (doubtfully) they will begin using the full
potential of the site and make videos, live songs, etc. available.
<email-address-deleted> wrote in message
news:20030219095511.527$email-address-deleted...
> "Kevin Jeffers" <email-address-deleted> wrote:
> > "vincent.tripodi" <email-address-deleted> wrote in message
> > news:20030219092635.915$email-address-deleted
> >
> > > what self respecting programmer would write a search engine like that?
> > > this site is crap, just like the last one. both visually and
> > > functionally.
> >
> > And you would do what to improve it.
>
> not enough content. once again Bruce has shown what an anal mfer he is.
> take a chance and put some stuff out there that no one has ever seen
> before. if the designers of this site were worth a damn they would have
> looked at greasylake and other sites and seen what they were up against..
> and gone back to bruce or his people and pitched a better design with more
> content. THERE IS NO CONTENT! lyrics, setlists, and sound bites? we
> already have that ad nauseum. how about some video?
>
> as far as design... it's all straight html. no flash. most people have
> broadband. the design is dull. what is there, like 3 new pictures?
>
> the discussion board template they used is the cheapest around and most
> difficult to navigate. livedaily isn't much better but it blows this one
> away.
>
> i could have done this site as you see it in a week, start to finish.
zero
> imagination. i'm not saying its just the designer .. it's bruce too. the
> site blows. same old shit with a new coat of paint.