Pop Rock
Re: [WOTP] The difficulty of writing really dreadful pop songs.
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 03:30:47 GMTNewsgroups: rec.arts.tv.mst3k.misc
Size: 1,961 bytes
"Stephen Cooke" <email-address-deleted> wrote in message news:email-address-deleted. .. > > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Joe Blevins wrote: > > > Recently, ROLLING STONE published an article speculating that Avril > > Lavigne's "self-penned" pop hits might actually be the work of professional > > songcrafters. > > To be fair, to write something that's simple and catchy and effective > *can* be difficult. <snip> ...Yeah, but somehow the hit factories of decades past (think: Motown, the Brill Building) were turning out much more artistically satisfying material than the slick uber-producers of today. A song can be simple, catchy, and effective without being soulless and disposable. There's such a numbing sameness to virtually everything on the radio. (Unfortunately, this applies to rock as well as pop. At least Marilyn Manson is doing his own thing and distinguishing himself from the Staind/Creed/Linkin Park ghetto.) I guess what I object to is the fact that ROLLING STONE and other music publications have been straining themselves to overpraise some really formulaic pop recently. Embarrassing superlatives are being heaped upon Justin, Xtina, Britney, Avril, and the rest. Words like "genius," "classic," and "brilliant" have lost all meaning when they're abused in this manner. Why didn't the Patridge Family, Tony Orlando, or the Bay City Rollers get the same kind of critical hosannas back in the 1970s? After all, their songs were simple, catchy, and effective, too -- and more distinctive than the TRL pop of today, I'd say. Rock and pop have ALWAYS been about short, simple, catchy songs. But now, Top 40 music is SO *cyincally* calculated, overproduced, niche-marketed, and formula-driven that it has ceased to be spontaneous or even HUMAN. And this swill is being praised to the skies by desperate rock critics frantically searching for "greatness" where it doesn't exist. --Joe--
